Saturday, 19 April 2025

Notes on Peruvian Copyright

 


 In my searching for new material, I came across a curious bit of animation from Peru.


 It's called La alfabetización, una herramienta de liberación or Literacy, a tool for liberation. It debuted in 1971 and was produced by the government to encourage efforts to eliminate illiteracy among the population. I don't think I've seen an animated work quite like it before. 

At that time, Peru was governed by a military Junta calling itself the Revolutionary Government of the Armed Forces.  Not the first, and sadly not the last, time Peru has fallen under the control of military strongmen. This Junta came to power via armed coup in 1968 and ruled until 1980. You may infer from its name that the mix of politics it promoted included strong social policies to address poverty and its ill effects on the population. Hence, initiatives like the animation above.

 The Junta was very active in using mass media to spread its messages, art and cultural works were funded via a mechanism called SINAMOS (National Mobilisation Support System). This raised the question of what this government's attitude towards Intellectual Property was and how that attitude affected current Peruvian culture. At present, Peru uses the life +70 years standard though that was not always the case, there were two major and important legal changes in 1961 and 1996 before that.

As far as I can tell, the Junta maintained the use of the 1961 law. As it stands, it's a little difficult to be certain with multiple legal acts in effect, some of which apply retroactively and some do not. Works that entered the public domain prior to 1971 remain in the public domain. Annoyingly, that's this interesting piece was released just after that. However, I believe this work is still in the public domain as the work was a creation of the government and Peru does not claim copyright on government works. Now, the current government is not the same government as the one that produced this short animation, but it was seen as the legitimate government of Peru internationally and 1968-80 is a long time, recognising it would cause quite a stir and would have to be made clear in the current legislation.

Thursday, 3 April 2025

War and Hell or Peace and Starvation by Eugene V. Debs

 

I came across this short article by Eugene V. Debs. It was written in 1915 but much of it, including the peace in the USA and war in Europe, is still very timely. I sometimes feel tired of saying that when going through historical records, especially since it only seems to apply to bad things, disease, poverty, war, corruption, bigotry etc. 

Debs was at the time the leader of the Socialist Party and was its pick for Presidential candidate, his opposition to American entry in the First World War and refusal to buckle to pressure led to his arrest, and he ran his last Presidential campaign from behind bars.

 

 Published in St. Louis Labor, whole no. 578 (Aug. 14, 1915),

 

 Because the workers have everything to lose, including their lives,
and absolutely nothing to gain in war, it does not follow under the
benevolent rule of capitalism that they have everything to gain and
nothing to lose in peace. In Europe just now the workers have war
and hell while in this country they are enjoying peace and starvation.
That there may be no mistake about the latter condition I quote from
the highest capitalistic authority, the Associated Press, which carries
the following dispatch:


COLUMBUS, Ohio, July 26th, 1915.— Reports received here
today from militia officers who have charge of the distribution of
food supplies among destitute families in the Southern Ohio coal
mining districts, prompted state officials to send out additional
appeals for contributions to aid in the relief work.


The reports showed that a large number of these 10,000
families in the Hocking and Sunday Creek Valleys are dependent
on outside aid for food. In describing conditions the word “piti-
able” appeared frequently in the reports. There is no strike in
these districts, but most of the miners are out of work owing to
the shutting down of the mines.


There is much more to the dispatch, but this is enough. There is
no war in this country and there is no strike in Ohio. Instead of war
and hell such as they have in Europe they have peace and starvation
in Ohio. The soldiers who are asphyxiated in the trenches have one
advantage in war over their fellow-workers who are starving in the
mining camps in peace — their agony is reduced to hours, perhaps
minutes, instead of being prolonged into a lifetime. Blessed are they
who are speedily reduced to wormfood, for they shall not see their
offspring starve in the midst of plenty.

 • • • • •
It is not the misfortune of the miners that condemns them to see
their wives and children starving before their eyes in a state bursting
with riches they themselves produced; it is their folly and crime in
common with the folly and crime of the people among whom they
live.


The men who shut down the mines and locked out the miners
and are now starving them and their families are not among those
crying for relief. They own the mines and control the jobs and can
shut out and starve the miners at will — by grace of the miners them-
selves, an overwhelming majority of whom belong to the same capi-
talist party their masters do and cast their votes with scrupulous fidel-
ity to perpetuate the boss ownership of the mine in which they work
and their own exclusion and starvation at their master’s will.


Blessed be the private ownership of the mines, for without it the
miners and their wives would lose their individuality, their homes
would be broken up, their morality destroyed, their religion wiped
out, and they would be denied forever the comfort and solace of pov-
erty and starvation!


When the miners themselves control the mines, once they have
learned how to control themselves, they will not lock themselves out
and starve themselves and their loved ones to death. The bosses are
very kindly doing this for them, but only because the miners them-
selves, by their votes and otherwise, have willed it.
The bosses lose their power and along with it their jobs when the
workers find theirs.


• • • • •


But I only meant to show that in peace as in war the workers are
the losers; if they are not killed in war they are starved in peace; if
they escape the trenches they are reserved for the slave pits.
The bosses are always the beneficiaries; the workers always the
victims. The Rockefellers never lose and the [John R.] Lawsons never
win. Such is capitalism and the workers who side with the bosses and
support capitalism politically and otherwise, and are therefore respon-
sible for capitalism, are also responsible for the hell they get in war
and the starvation they suffer in peace.

 

Labels

1770s (1) 1810s (1) 1820s (1) 1880s (2) 1890s (6) 1900s (5) 1910s (8) 1920s (16) 1930s (11) 1940s (12) 1950s (5) 1960s (4) 1970s (6) 1980s (1) 2000s (2) 2010s (1) 2020s (1) Activism (1) Adverts (1) Animation (8) archive matters (1) Canada (1) comics (4) Copyright Reform (2) Disney (6) Documentaries (3) Drama (2) Essays (38) Europe (1) Fantasy (3) Film (21) George Orwell (10) Germany (2) Greta Garbo (1) horror (4) images (12) Japan (1) LGBTQ (1) news (1) Newspapers (1) Newsreels (3) Noir (1) Open Media (3) photography (1) poetry (5) Reviews (3) Robert frost (1) Romance (2) Science Fiction (4) Silent (3) texts (36) thrillers (1) trademarks (2) translation (1) UK (4) Videogames (3) War movies (3) Westerns (1)